Repeated L5 Nerve Root Compromise Detected with Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP), but Not Electromyography (EMG): A Case Report.

We report a case where neuromonitoring, using motor evoked potentials (MEP), detected an intraoperative L5 nerve root deficit during a lumbosacral decompression and instrumented fusion procedure. Critically, the MEP changes were not preceded nor accompanied by any significant spontaneous electromyography (sEMG) activity. Presumptive L5 innervated muscles, including tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and gluteus maximus, were targets for nerve root surveillance using combined MEP and sEMG techniques. During a high-grade spondylolisthesis correction procedure, attempts to align a left-sided rod resulted in repeated loss and recovery cycles of MEP from the TA and EHL. No accompanying EMG alerts were associated with any of the MEP changes nor were MEP variations seen from muscles innervated above and below L5. After several attempts, the rod alignment was achieved, but significant MEP signal decrement (72% decrease) remained from the EHL. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant foot drop on the left side that recovered over a period of 3 months. This case contributes to a growing body of evidence that exclusive reliance on sEMG for spinal nerve root scrutiny can be unreliable and MEP may provide more dependable data on nerve root patency.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Corrective Surgery of Scoliosis - Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in reducing the postoperative neurologic deficit following corrective surgery of scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN: Observational Study. Place and Duration of the Study: Spine Surgery Department, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from December 2022 to May 2023. METHODOLOGY: The study included 170 cases of scoliosis operated under multimodal IONM. Decreased amplitude of ≥50% in SSEP or 70-80% in MEPs were considered warning signs. Cases were divided into two groups: Group 1 (signal drop) and Group 2 (no signal drop). Group 1 was subdivided into Group 1a (true positive), Group 1b (false positive) and Group 1c (intermediate positive). Group 2 was subdivided into Group 2a (true negative) and Group 2b (false negative). RESULTS: Evoked potential changes were observed in 27 (15.9%) cases. This includes transient drop of signals in 16 (9.4%) and sustained drop of signals in 11 (6.5%) cases. Among sustained signal drop, 9 (5.29%) cases had exhibited postoperative neurological deficit whereas 2 (1.17%) cases did not show postoperative neurological deficit (false positive). Multimodal IONM in the current study shows sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98.6%, positive predictive value of 92.6%, and negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: Multimodal IONM reduces the incidence of postoperative neurological deficit in corrective surgery of scoliosis by effectively detecting neurologic injury during surgery. Monitoring events alert surgical team to exercise immediate corrective measures which likely results in recovery of lost signals and predict the favorable outcome. KEY WORDS: Intraoperative monitoring, Motor evoked potentials, Neurological deficit, Scoliosis, Somatosensory evoked potentials.

Removal of schwannoma from the psoas muscle with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: A case report.

RATIONALE: The incidence of a schwannoma within the psoas muscle is rare, and only a few cases have been reported. The surgical approach to removing schwannomas present in the psoas muscle is challenging because of its anatomical proximity to the lumbar plexus. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 31-year-old man experienced right lower back pain and anterolateral thigh numbness for 2 months. DIAGNOSIS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient's lumbar spine revealed a mass lesion, which was radiologically diagnosed as a well-demarcated schwannoma. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent surgery for excision of the schwannoma in the right psoas muscle at the second to fourth lumbar vertebrae levels. During surgery, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring modalities, free-running and triggered electromyography and evoked potentials, from the target muscles were recorded. OUTCOMES: There was no neurotonic discharge corresponding to neuronal injury. Compound motor nerve action potential was detected in the triggered electromyography of muscles around the medial margin of the tumor. However, direct integration of the motor nerve was not observed in the intra-tumor region. LESSONS: We report that schwannoma removal in the psoas muscle, which is adjacent to the lumbar plexus, can be safely performed using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Prospective Validation of the Spinal Cord Shape Classification System in the Prediction of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Data Loss: Assessing the Risk of Spinal Cord Data Loss During Spinal Deformity Correction.

BACKGROUND: The Spinal Cord Shape Classification System (SCSCS) class has been associated with spinal cord monitoring data loss during spinal deformity surgery. The objective of the current study was to prospectively validate the SCSCS as a predictor of spinal cord monitoring data loss during spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who were undergoing primary deformity surgery at a single institution from 2018 to 2023 and whose major curve was in the spinal cord region was undertaken. Spinal cord morphology at the apex of the major curve on preoperative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used to categorize patients into 3 spinal cord shape types based on the SCSCS. The primary outcome was intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data loss related to spinal cord dysfunction. Demographics and surgical and radiographic variables were compared between patients with IONM data loss and those without loss. Predictors of IONM loss were determined using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients (168 adult, 88 pediatric) were included and were separated into 3 SCSCS types: 110 (43.0%) with Type I, 105 (41.0%) with Type II, and 41 (16.0%) with Type III. IONM loss was observed in 30 (11.7%) of the 256 patients, including 7 (6.4%) of 110 with SCSCS Type I, 7 (6.7%) of 105 with Type II, and 16 (39.0%) of 41 with Type III. IONM loss was associated with SCSCS Type III, the preoperative deformity angular ratio, performance of 3-column osteotomies, greater operative time, greater transfusion volume, and greater postoperative sagittal corrections. SCSCS type was the strongest independent predictor of IONM data loss. SCSCS Type III had the greatest odds of IONM loss (odds ratio [OR] = 6.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.45 to 18.23 compared with Types I and II combined). The overall predictive performance with respect to IONM loss (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.827) was considered excellent. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective cohort study of patients undergoing spinal deformity correction confirmed that patients with a Type-III spinal cord shape had greater odds of IONM loss. Inclusion of the SCSCS in preoperative risk stratification and intraoperative management of spinal deformity corrective surgery is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Lead Placement for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Literature Review and Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a viable interventional option for intractable pain management. Although systematic data are lacking regarding the immediate neurologic complications of this procedure, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) can be a valuable tool to detect real-time neurologic changes and prompt intervention(s) during DRG-S performed under general anesthesia and deep sedation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our single-center case series, we performed multimodal IONM, including peripheral nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (pnSSEPs) and dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEPs), spontaneous electromyography (EMG), transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and electroencephalogram (EEG) for some trials and all permanent DRG-S lead placement per surgeon preference. Alert criteria for each IONM modality were established before data acquisition and collection. An IONM alert was used to implement an immediate repositioning of the lead to reduce any possible postoperative neurologic deficits. We reviewed the literature and summarized the current IONM modalities commonly applied during DRG-S, including somatosensory evoked potentials and EMG. Because DRG-S targets the dorsal roots, we hypothesized that including dSSEP would allow more sensitivity as a proxy for potential sensory changes under generalized anesthesia than would including standard pnSSEPs. RESULTS: From our case series of 22 consecutive procedures with 45 lead placements, one case had an alert immediately after DRG-S lead positioning. In this case, dSSEP attenuation was seen, indicating changes in the S1 dermatome, which occurred despite ipsilateral pnSSEP from the posterior tibial nerve remaining at baselines. The dSSEP alert prompted the surgeon to reposition the S1 lead, resulting in immediate recovery of the dSSEP to baseline status. The rate of IONM alerts reported intraoperatively was 4.55% per procedure and 2.22% per lead (n = 1). No neurologic deficits were reported after the procedure, resulting in no postoperative neurologic complications or deficits. No other IONM changes or alerts were observed from pnSSEP, spontaneous EMG, MEPs, or EEG modalities. Reviewing the literature, we noted challenges and potential deficiencies when using current IONM modalities for DRG-S procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series suggests dSSEPs offer greater reliability than do pnSSEPs in quickly detecting neurologic changes, and subsequent neural injury, during DRG-S cases. We encourage future studies to focus on adding dSSEP to standard pnSSEP to provide a comprehensive, real-time neurophysiological assessment during lead placement for DRG-S. More investigation, collaboration, and evidence are required to evaluate, compare, and standardize comprehensive IONM protocols for DRG-S.

The effects of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring modalities during corrective scoliosis surgery in pediatric patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: During scoliosis surgery, motor evoked potentials (MEP), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) have been reported to be affected by the use of higher doses of anesthetic agents. Dexmedetomidine, a sympatholytic agent, an alpha-2 receptor agonist, has been used as an adjunctive agent to lower anesthetic dose. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of dexmedetomidine on the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of MEP and SSEP during surgery, particularly among pediatric patients. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to determine whether, during spinal fusion surgery in pediatric patients with scoliosis, dexmedetomidine alters MEP amplitude or SSEP latency and amplitude and, if so, whether different doses of dexmedetomidine display different effects (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022300562). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library on January 1, 2022 and included randomized controlled trials, observational cohort and case-control studies and case series investigating dexmedetomidine in the population of interest and comparing against a standardized anesthesia regimen without dexmedetomidine or comparing multiple doses of dexmedetomidine. Animal and in vitro studies and conference abstracts were excluded. RESULTS: We found substantial heterogeneity in the risk of bias (per Cochrane-preferred tools) of the included articles (n = 5); results are summarized without meta-analysis. Articles with the lowest risk of bias indicated that dexmedetomidine was associated with MEP loss and that higher doses of dexmedetomidine increased risk. In contrast, articles reporting no association between dexmedetomidine and MEP loss suffered from higher risk of bias, including suspected or confirmed problems with confounding, outcome measurement, participant selection, results reporting, and lack of statistical transparency and power. CONCLUSION: Given the limitations of the studies available in the literature, it would be advisable to conduct rigorous randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine use of in scoliosis surgery in pediatric patients.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord stimulator implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most dreaded complications after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implantation surgery. As a result, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been proposed to avoid accidental damage to nervous structures under anesthesia and confirm positioning for optimal stimulation. Our study uses a large administrative claims database to determine the 30-day risk of SCI after SCS implantation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from 2016 to 2019. Adult patients undergoing SCS surgical procedures with at least 90 days of follow-up, IONM use, the type of sedation used during the procedure, and subsequent SCI were identified using administrative codes. In addition, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between various risk factors and subsequent SCI. RESULTS: A total of 9676 patients underwent SCS surgery (64.7% percutaneous implants) during the study period. Nine hundred and forty-four (9.75%) patients underwent SCS implantation with IONM. Conscious sedation, Monitored Anesthesia Care anesthesia, and general anesthesia were used in patients with 0.9%, 60.2%, and 28.6%, respectively. Eighty-one (0.8%) patients developed SCI within 30 days after SCS implant surgery. The SCI rate was higher in the group that underwent IONM (2% vs 0.7%, p value <0.001) during the implantation procedure, reflecting the underlying risk. After adjustment for other factors, the OR of SCI is 2.39 (95% CI: 1.33 to 4.14, p value=0.002) times higher for those with IONM than those without IONM. CONCLUSIONS: Increased SCI risk among patients with IONM likely reflects higher baseline risk, and further research is needed for risk mitigation.

Changes in motor evoked potentials after erector spinae block in scoliosis surgery-when to take pre-incision baseline recordings?

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is highly valuable in scoliosis surgeries for monitoring spinal cord function, particularly during instrumentation. Accurate timing of baseline recordings of TcMEP and SSEP is crucial, as any changes observed during surgery and instrumentation are compared to these baseline recordings. However, the impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block (USG-ESPB) on SSEP and TcMEP is not well-studied in scoliosis surgery. In this report, we present two cases of scoliosis surgery where bilateral two-level USG-ESPB using different concentrations of ropivacaine (0.375% and 0.2%) resulted in a transient and significant deterioration of TcMEP, occurring 3 minutes after the block and lasting for 20 minutes. Remarkably, SSEPs remained unchanged during this period. These findings suggest that USG-ESPB may produce TcMEP changes, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the timing of baseline TcMEP acquisition in scoliosis surgery.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Spines at Risk During Nonspine Surgery: A 9-Year Review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with certain spinal anomalies are at risk for rare but devastating spinal cord injuries under anesthesia. We created a Spine at Risk (SAR) program to evaluate and recommend precautions for such patients, including intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) use for the highest-risk patients. We aimed to review all monitored nonspine procedures to determine rate of potential spinal cord injuries avoided in those who would otherwise have been unmonitored. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional SAR program from 2011 to 2019 to analyze the number of nonspine anesthetized procedures that were done under IONM, the characteristics of those that had an IONM alert; and the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 3,453 patients flagged for SAR review, 1121 (33%) received a precaution recommendation, and 359 (10% of all flagged) were given IONM recommendations. Of those, 57 patients (16% of recommendations, 2% of all flagged) had a total of 102 nonspine anesthetized procedures done under IONM. Seven patients had a total of 10 cases with IONM alerts. Two cases were aborted when improved signals could not be obtained after working through a checklist; one of these patients woke with transient neurological deficits. Signals improved to baseline in 7 cases by working through a signal loss checklist. One case was aborted preoperatively when monitorable baseline signals could not be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: In the highest-risk spinal anomaly patients, we monitored an average of 11.7 nonspine cases per year, with a 10% rate of IONM alerts, and no permanent neurological deficits. Although the majority of patients remain safe during procedures, in the most critical patients IONM allowed the team to identify and react to alerts that may have otherwise led to permanent neurological injury. This is the largest series of spinal cord-monitored nonspine pediatric cases. It is important for pediatric orthopedic surgeons to evaluate at-risk patients and recommend IONM where appropriate, to protect both patients and our procedural colleagues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.

Role of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring to Predict Postoperative Delirium in Cardiovascular Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative delirium (POD) can occur in up to 50% of older patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, resulting in hospitalization and significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) modalities can be used to predict delirium in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. DESIGN: Adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with IONM between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Delirium was assessed multiple times using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC). Patients with an ICDSC score ≥4 were considered to have POD. Significant IONM changes were evaluated based on a visual review of electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials data and documentation of significant changes during surgery. SETTING: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 18 years old and older undergoing cardiovascular surgery with IONM monitoring. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 578 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with IONM, 126 had POD (21.8%). Significant IONM changes were noted in 134 patients, of whom 49 patients had delirium (36.6%). In contrast, 444 patients had no IONM changes during surgery, of whom 77 (17.3%) patients had POD. Upon multivariate analysis, IONM changes were associated with POD (odds ratio 2.12; 95% CI 1.31-3.44; p < 0.001). Additionally, baseline EEG abnormalities were associated with POD (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Significant IONM changes are associated with an increased risk of POD in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. These findings offer a basis for future research and analysis of EEG and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring to predict, detect, and prevent POD.

Intra-operative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Correction Surgery with Pre-operative Neurological Deficit: Its Feasibility and High-risk Factors for Failed Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Considering spinal deformity patients with pre-operative neurological deficit were associated with more intra-operative iatrogenic neurological complications than those without, intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been used for detecting possible iatrogenic injury timely. However, the IONM waveforms are often unreliable. To analyze the performance of intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients with pre-operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery, and to identify the high-risk factors for failed IONM. METHODS: Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery between October 2017 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The presence or absence of SEP and MEP of target muscles were separately recorded. The P37/N50 latency and amplitude of SEP, and the MEP amplitude were measured. Any IONM alerts were also recorded. The IONM performance was compared among patients with different etiologies, levels responsible for neurological deficit, and strength of IONM-target muscles. Patients' demographics were analyzed using the descriptive statistics and were presented with mean ± standard deviation. Comparison analysis was performed using χ2 -test and statistically significant difference was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients (147 males, 123 females) with an average age of 48.4 ± 36.7 years were involved. The SEP records were available in 371 (68.7%) lower extremities while MEP records were available in 418 (77.4%). SEP alerts were reported in 31 lower extremities and MEP alerts in 22, and new neurological deficit at post-operation was observed in 11. The etiologies of neuromuscular and syndromic indicated relatively lower success rates of IONM, which were 44.1% and 40.5% for SEP, and 58.8% and 59.5% for MEP (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with pre-operative neurological deficit caused by cervical spine and muscle strength lower than grade 4 suffered from higher risk of failed IONM waveforms (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit suffered from a higher incidence of failed IONM results. The high-risk for failed IONM waveforms included the neuromuscular and syndromic etiologies, neurological deficit caused by cervical spine, muscle strength lower than grade 4 in patients with pre-operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Spinal Cord Stimulation Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the state of literature regarding the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during spinal cord stimulator surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the use of IONM during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgery was performed using the following three data bases: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase. Research techniques included systematic research following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol by Cochrane, and backward searching. Qualitative analysis of included articles was performed using the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies assessment tool. Direction of effect, consistency across studies, and cost-effectiveness were narratively synthesized. RESULTS: A total of 15 records were identified through data base searching. All records used IONM methods under general anesthesia for guidance of epidural lead placement. IONM techniques used for determining lateralization in the found articles were compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) (n = 8), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) (n = 3) or both (n = 4). Motor evoked potentials were used in three trials for neuroprotection purposes. Two studies were comparative, and 12 were noncomparative. CONCLUSIONS: We found a good body of level II evidence that using IONM during SCS surgery is a valid alternative to awake surgery and may even be superior regarding pain management, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative neurologic deficits. In direct comparison, the found evidence suggested using CMAP provided more consistently favorable results than using SSEP for midline placement of epidural leads under general anesthesia. Selection of IONM modality should be made on the basis of pathophysiology of disease, individual IONM experience, and the individual patient.

Utilidad de la monitorización neurofisiológica intraoperatoria como valor pronóstico de la parálisis facial posquirúrgica en schwannomas vestibulares / Utility of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring as a prognostic value of postoperative facial paresis in vestibular schwannomas

Antecedentes y objetivo La monitorización neurofisiológica intraoperatoria permite predecir la situación funcional del nervio facial tras la cirugía de schwannoma vestibular. Dada la gran variabilidad de los protocolos neurofisiológicos utilizados para ello, el objetivo del presente estudio es determinar la capacidad pronóstica del protocolo neurofisiológico usado en nuestro servicio. Material y métodos Se realizó un análisis estadístico de los datos de monitorización neurofisiológica recogidos en los pacientes intervenidos entre marzo de 2009 y julio de 2021 en el Servicio de Neurocirugía de Salamanca según su situación funcional, tanto en el período posquirúrgico inmediato como al año de la cirugía. Resultados Se analizó a 51 pacientes de entre 46 y 63 años (mediana: 54). Al estudiar el valor umbral de la intensidad de estimulación del nervio facial y la variación de los potenciales motores evocados córtico-bulbares, se hallaron diferencias significativas (p=0,043 y p=0,011, respectivamente) entre los pacientes con buena y mala situación clínica tras la cirugía. El valor umbral de intensidad más discriminativo fue 0,35mA (sensibilidad: 85%; especificidad: 48%). No se halló relación estadística en el grupo de estudio al año de la cirugía. Conclusiones El protocolo de monitorización intraoperatoria utilizado nos permite predecir la situación clínica de los pacientes en el período posquirúrgico inmediato y mejorar la información al paciente y sus familiares tras la intervención. No podemos, en cambio, utilizar estos parámetros para la predicción de la situación funcional al año de la cirugía ni para la toma de decisiones clínicas al respecto (AU)

Background and objective Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring allows us to predict the functional status of the facial nerve after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Due to the great variability of the neurophysiological protocols used for it, the goal of this study is to determine the prognostic ability of our neurophysiological protocol. Material and methods We have performed a statistical analysis of the neurophysiological monitoring data collected from patients operated between March 2009 and July 2021 at the Neurosurgery Service of Salamanca according to their functional status, both in the immediate post-surgical period and one year after surgery. Results A number of 51 patients between 46 and 63 years old (median: 54) were analyzed. We have found significant differences studying the threshold value of the stimulation intensity of the facial nerve and the variation of the Cortico-bulbar Evoked Motor Potentials (P=0.043 and P=0.011, respectively) between the patients with good and bad clinical situation after surgery. The most discriminating intensity threshold value was 0.35mA (Sensitivity: 85%; Specificity: 48%). No statistical relationship was found in the study group one year after surgery. Conclusions Our intraoperative monitoring protocol allows us to predict the clinical situation of patients in the immediate postoperative period and improve information for the patient and her relatives after surgery. We cannot, however, use these parameters to predict the functional situation one year after surgery and make clinical decisions in this regard (AU)

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring in Predicting Dysphagia After Brainstem and Fourth Ventricle Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia represents the main complication of posterior fossa neurosurgery. Adequate diagnosis of this complication is warranted to prevent untimely extubation with subsequent aspiration. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) modalities may be used for this purpose. However, it is not known which IONM modality may be significant for diagnosis. This study aimed to define the most significant IONM modality for dysphagia prognostication after posterior fossa neurosurgery. METHODS: The analysis included 46 patients (34 with tumors of the fourth ventricle and 12 with brainstem localization) who underwent surgical excision of the tumor. Neurologic symptoms before and after neurosurgery were noted and magnetic resonance imaging with the subsequent volume estimation of the removed mass was performed, followed by an IONM findings analysis (mapping of the nucleus of the caudal cranial nerves [CN] and corticobulbar motor-evoked potentials [CoMEP]). RESULTS: Aggravation of dysphagia was noted in 24% of the patients, more often in patients with tumor localization in the fourth ventricle (26%) than in those with brainstem mass lesions (16%). Mapping of the caudal cranial nerve nuclei did not correlate with the dysfunction of these structures. CoMEP was significantly associated with the neurologic state of the CN. The decrease in CoMEP is a significant prognostic factor for postoperative bulbar symptoms appearance or aggravation. CONCLUSIONS: Mapping the CN is an important identification tool. The CoMEP modality should be used intraoperatively to determine the functional state of the CN and predict postoperative dysphagia.

The TOFr of 0.75 to 0.85 is the optimal timing for IONM during thyroid surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUD: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is one of the serious complications of thyroid tumour surgery, surgical treatment of thyroid cancer requires careful consideration of the RLN and its impact on glottis function. There has been no unified standard for precise neuromuscular block monitoring to guide the monitoring of RLN in thyroid surgery. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between Train-of-four stabilization ratio (TOFr) and neural signal values of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (INOM) during thyroid operation, and further to determine the optimal timing for INOM during thyroid operation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for thyroid tumour resection with INOM and RLN monitoring from April 2018 to July 2018 in our center were recruited. Electromyography (EMG) signals and corresponding TOFr were collected. All nerve stimulation data were included in group VR. Vagus nerve stimulation data were included in Subgroup V. RLN stimulation data were included in Subgroup R. The timing of recording was as follows: Vagus nerve EMG amplitude after opening the lateral space between the thyroid and carotid sheath and before the initiation of thyroid dissection, RLN EMG amplitude at first recognition, RLN EMG amplitude after complete thyroid dissection (Repeat three times), and Vagus nerve EMG amplitude after resection of the thyroid (Repeat three times). Correlation analysis of continuous variables was described by a scatter diagram. Pearson correlation analysis or Spearman correlation analysis was used for the two groups of variables. RESULTS: Finally, 134 vagus nerve signals and 143 RLN signals were analysed after matching with TOFr. The EMG amplitude in the VR group and subgroups after nerve stimulation was positively correlated with TOFr (p < 0.05). In the VR, V and R group, the incidence of EMG ≥ 500 µV in the 0.75 < TOFr ≤ 0.85 interval was significantly higher than the 0 < TOFr ≤ 0.75 interval (P = 0.002, P = 0.013 and P = 0.029), and has no statistical difference compared to 0.85 < TOFr ≤ 0.95 interval (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The EMG signals of the RLN and vagus nerve stimulation during thyroid surgery were positively correlated with TOFr. TOFr > 0.75 could reflect more than 50% of the effective nerve electrophysiological signals, 0.75 < TOFr ≤ 0.85 interval was the optimal timing for IONM during thyroid surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015797) Registered on 20/04/2018. https://www.chictr.org.cn .

Utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in detecting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during surgical correction of spinal deformity has been shown to reduce iatrogenic injury in pediatric and adult populations. Although motor-evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), and electromyography (EMG) have been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in detecting spinal cord and nerve root injuries, their utility in detecting motor and sensory nerve root injury in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains unknown. PURPOSE: We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of unimodal and multimodal IONM in the surgical management of HGS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for treatment of HGS. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on patient demographics, spinopelvic and spondylolisthesis parameters, and the presence of pre-and postoperative neurological deficits were collected. METHODS: Intraoperative MEP, SSEP, and EMG alerts were recorded. Alert criteria were defined as a change in amplitude of more than 50% for MEP and/or SSEP, with or without change in latency, and more than 10 seconds of sustained EMG activity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each modality and the combination of MEP and SSEP. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method. RESULTS: Fifty-four pediatric patients with HGS undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2021 in a single tertiary center were included. Seventy-two percent (39/54) of patients were female; the average age of patients was 13.7±2.3 years. The sensitivity of MEP in detecting new postoperative neurologic deficit was 92.3% (95% CI [64.0-99.8]), SSEP 77.8% (95% CI [40.0-97.2]), EMG 69.2% (95% CI [38.6-90.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 100% (95% CI [73.5-100]). The specificity of MEP was 80.0% (95% CI [64.4-91.0]), SSEP 95.1% (95% CI [83.5-99.4]), EMG 65.9% (95% CI [49.4-79.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 82.9% (95% CI [67.9-92.9]). The accuracy of SSEP was 92.0% (95% CI [80.8%-97.8%]), and the combination of MEP and SSEP was 86.8% (95% CI [74.7%-94.5%]). Twelve (22.2%) patients had a new motor or sensory deficit diagnosed immediately postoperatively. Nine patients made a full recovery, and 3 had some neurologic deficit on final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Unimodal IONM using SSEP and MEP alone were accurate in diagnosing sensory and motor nerve root injuries, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in predicting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric HGS improved further with the use of multimodal IONM (combining MEP and SEP). We recommend the utilization of multimodal IONM in all HGS PSF surgeries.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with spinal deformities undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent neurological deficit. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows early detection of SCI which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. The primary aim of this literature review was to search if there are threshold values of TcMEP and SSEP in the literature that are widely accepted as alert during IONM. The secondary aim was to update knowledge concerning IONM during scoliosis surgery. METHOD: PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases were used to search publication from 2012 to 2022. The following keywords were used: evoked potential, scoliosis, surgery, intraoperative monitoring and neurophysiological. We included all studies dealing with SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: We included 43 papers. Rates of IONM alert and neurological deficit varied from 0.56 to 64% and from 0.15 to 8.3%, respectively. Threshold values varied from a loss of 50 to 90% for TcMEP amplitude, whereas it seems that a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted for SSEP. Causes of IONM changes most frequently reported were surgical maneuver. CONCLUSION: Concerning SSEP, a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted as an alert. For TcMEP, it seems that the use of highest threshold values can avoid unnecessary surgical procedure for the patient without increasing risk of neurological deficit.

Feasibility of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for extramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Extramedullary spinal cord tumors (EMSCTs) are mostly benign tumors which are increasingly diagnosed and operatively treated in the elderly. While there are hints that multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) could be influenced by age and age-related comorbidities, no study has ever systematically evaluated its feasibility and value for EMSCT surgery in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with microsurgical EMSCT resection under continuous multimodal IONM with SSEPs, MEPs and electromyography between 2016 and 2020. Epidemiological, clinical, imaging and operative/IONM records as well as detailed individual outcomes were analyzed and compared for the cohort < / ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: Mean age was 45 years in cohort < 65 years (n = 109) and 76 years in cohort ≥ 65 years (n = 64), while baseline/operative characteristics did not significantly differ. Mean baseline SSEPs' latencies (left-right average) were significantly higher in the cohort ≥ 65 years for both median (20.9 ms vs. 22.1 ms; p < 0.01) and tibial nerve (42.9 ms vs. 46.1 ms; p < 0.01) without significant differences for SSEPs' amplitudes. Stimulation intensity to elicit intraoperative MEPs was significantly higher in the cohort ≥ 65 years (surrogate-marker: left-right-averaged quotient ID1-muscle/abductor-hallucis-muscle; 1.6 vs. 2.1; p < 0.001). Intraoperatively, SSEP and MEP monitoring were feasible in 99%/100% and 99%/98% for the cohort < / ≥ 65 years without significant differences in rates for significant IONM changes during surgery or postoperatively new sensorimotor deficits. Sensitivity of IONM was 29%/43%, specificity 99%/98%, positive and negative predictive values 67%/75% and 95%/93% for the cohort < / ≥ 65 years. Overall, age was no risk factor for IONM feasibility or rate of significant IONM changes. DISCUSSION: Multimodal IONM is feasible/reliable for EMSCT surgery in elderly patients. An age-related prolongation of SSEPs' latencies and demand for higher stimulation intensities for MEPs' elicitation has to be considered.

Analyzing the value of IONM as a complex intervention: The gap between published evidence and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) was investigated as a complex intervention (CI) as defined by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) in published studies to identify challenges and solutions in estimating IONM's effects on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A scoping review to April 2022 of the influence of setting on what was implemented as IONM and how it influenced postoperative outcomes was performed for studies that compared IONM to no IONM cohorts. IONM complexity was assessed with the iCAT_SR tool. Causal graphs were used to represent this complexity. RESULTS: IONM implementation depended on the surgical procedure, institution and/or surgeon. "How" IONM influenced neurologic outcomes was attributed to surgeon or institutional experience with the surgical procedure, surgeon or institutional experience with IONM, co-interventions in addition to IONM, models of IONM service delivery and individual characteristics of the IONM provider. Indirect effects of IONM mediated by extent of tumor resection, surgical approach, changes in operative procedure, shorter operative time, and duration of aneurysm clipping were also described. There were no quantitative estimates of the relative contribution of these indirect effects to total IONM effects on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: IONM is a complex intervention whose evaluation is more challenging than that of a simple intervention. Its implementation and largely indirect effects depend on specific settings that are usefully represented in causal graphs. SIGNIFICANCE: IONM evaluation as a complex intervention aided by causal graphs and multivariable analysis could provide a valuable framework for future study design and assessments of IONM effectiveness in different settings.